Electron density in the quiet solar coronal transition region from SoHO/SUMER measurements of S VI line radiance and opacity
Titre | Electron density in the quiet solar coronal transition region from SoHO/SUMER measurements of S VI line radiance and opacity |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2009 |
Auteurs | Buchlin, É, Vial, JC |
Journal | Astronomy & Astrophysics |
Volume | 503 |
Pagination | 559-568 |
Date Published | Aug |
ISBN Number | 0004-6361 |
Numéro d'accès | WOS:000269726200025 |
Résumé | Context. The steep temperature and density gradients that are measured in the coronal transition region challenge the model interpretation of observations. Aims. We derive the average electron density < ne > in the region emitting the S vi lines. We use two different techniques, which allow us to derive linearly-weighted (opacity method) and quadratically-weighted (emission measure method) electron density along the line-of-sight, to estimate a filling factor or derive the layer thickness at the formation temperature of the lines. Methods. We analyze SoHO/SUMER spectroscopic observations of the S vi lines, using the center-to-limb variations in radiance, the center-to-limb ratios of radiance and line width, and the radiance ratio of the 93.3-94.4 nm doublet to derive the opacity. We also use the emission measure derived from radiance at disk center. Results. We derive an opacity tau(0) at S VI 93.3 nm line center of the order of 0.05. The resulting average electron density < n(e)>, under simple assumptions concerning the emitting layer, is 2.4 x 1016 m(-3) at T = 2 x 10(5) K. This value is higher than (and inconsistent with) the values obtained from radiance measurements (2 x 10(15) m(-3)). The last value corresponds to an electron pressure of 10(-2) Pa. Conversely, taking a classical value for the density leads to a too high value of the thickness of the emitting layer. Conclusions. The pressure derived from the emission measure method compares well with previous determinations. It implies a low opacity of between 5 x 10(-3) and 10(-2). It remains unexplained why a direct derivation leads to a much higher opacity, despite tentative modeling of observational biases. Further measurements in S vi and other lines emitted at a similar temperature should be completed, and more realistic models of the transition region need to be used. |